Belgians Protest "Dictatorship" Established Under Pandemic Pretext

valentine28 september 2009 – 23:39

Terwijl Belgie internationale befaamdheid geniet over het protest tegen de uitzonderingswet en er in de - alternatieve- pers gerapporteerd wordt over de gevaren voor de burgerrechten voor belgen door het voorstel tot bijzondere wet van Onckelinx is er hier niets over te lezen...

OP deze franstalige website kan je de akties van een aantal bezorgde burgers... volgen uit het waalse landsgedeelte:
http://www.murieldesclee.org/index.php

Dit is de site van Jane Burgermeister de vrouw die klacht indiende tegen Baxter bij de FBI in Oostenrijk.
http://www.theflucase.com/

.......waar een verslag op te vinden is van hun protest.

The Belgian newspaper Le Soir has attacked the decision by the Belgian
government to give sweeping "special powers" to a crisis committee
established to oversee the "pandemic emergency" for six months or
until July 2010 at the latest.

The special powers allow a small group of ministers and the King of
Belgium to bypass parliament and enact any law that they consider
"necessary" to deal with the pandemic emergency, such as compelling
nurses and police to carry out forced vaccinations.

A comment from Le Soir newspaper appeared today, 24 September 2009, on
page 3 under the pen name of Ricardo Gutièrrez, saying that the
Belgian people were far more concerned by the arsenal of "special
powers" that the federal government was deploying than by the
"pandemic" itself.

It is stated that French health professionals last Wednesday demanded
"scientific proof" that the "swine flu" vaccine is necessary and not
dangerous, especially to pregnant women and young children.

Georges-Henri Beauthier, a lawyer acting on behalf of concerned
citizen groups, is preparing to send a nine page letter to all the
members of the federal parliament informing them of the risks
associated with the vaccine, especially with adjuvants.

Beauthier said that politicians were reacting to a very "theoretical"
risk by passing measures detrimental to civic rights.

In another interview in Le Soir, the lawyers Ines Wouters, an expert
in human rights, and Philippe Vanlangendonck, an expert in medical
law, said there is no justification for the suspension of Parliament
in Belgium under the pretext of a pandemic emergency.

"We can see no reason in the actual circumstances today to turn
Belgium virtually into a kind of dictatorship," Wouters said.

Vanlangendonck said that there was no reason to transfer powers from
parliament to an executive when all institutions were functioning, and
when parliament had just been recalled, medical professionals were
working efficiently and the economy had not been noticeably affected
by the pandemic.

Wouters said that the government was trying to give a legal basis to
illegal decisions to distribute anti viral medicines in April that
have not been properly licensed.

In a hard hitting interview on Belgian TV on Tuesday with the the
Belgian Health Minister Laurette Onkelinx, a Belgian reporter called
the decision by the public health committee to give "super powers" to
an executive and suspend parliament to deal with a pandemic was
"disproportionate" in view of the fact that there were only 6,000
cases of mild swine flu in the country so far and no sign of a
catasrophe.

Onkelinx replied that it was a "necessary evil."

"I don't like [imposing mlitary rule] at all," she said. "But it's
indispensable."

She also said people who claimed the "swine flu" vaccine was dangerous
were "crazy" , arguing it would only be given if approved by the
European Medicines Agency - but as the agency itself states in its own
documents:

"The safety of the vaccine will not be proven before it is given to
people in the biggest "experiment" in history."

Wat mij vooral bezorgd maakt

TA°JOE, 29/09/2009 – 19:34

Wat mij vooral bezorgd maakt is het laatste antwoord van Minister Onkelinx aan deze groep onafhankelijke professionelen, dat zij slechts een minderheidsopinie vertegenwoordigen die als dusdanig niet relevant is.

Het is duidelijk dat de bevolking, die dus de “meerderheidsopinie” vertegenwoordigt, door Volksgezondheid zelf, met heel tegenstrijdige en wetenschappelijk onverantwoorde berichtgeving geinformeerd is. Elk open onafhankelijk wetenschappelijk debat wordt geweigerd. Dit is pure en misdadige manipulatie van de bevolking om een valse “meerderheidsopinie” te creëren. Deze onverantwoorde manier van handelen ondermijnt zwaar de democratie. Het parlement, als vertegenwoordiger van de bevolking moet hier onverkort zijn verantwoordelijkheid nemen en de bevolking hiertegen beschermen.

Daarom moeten we er op aandringen om iedere verdere stap in dit dossier radicaal stop te zetten er tot een publiek, open en onafhankelijk wetenschappelijk debat komt en duidelijke, wetenschappelijk onderbouwde informatie aan de bevolking geven wordt, zodat een “echte meerderheidsopinie” gevormd kan wordt. Dit zijn de parlementsleden aan de bevolking verplicht, willen zij de democratie niet ernstig in gevaar brengen.